![]() You can use it to download a share folder or small collection of files, but it’s easily forgotten since you won’t have to use it very often. Instead, it’s for managing your backup and your account. There’s also a web client for SpiderOak One, although it isn’t really designed for backing up and restoring files. However, the “preferences” menu is better, with self-explanatory headings that separate the options more evenly. Other layout issues, such as file restores being under “manage” rather than a dedicated “restore” tab, can make it harder to learn. The “manage,” “sync” and “share” tabs are all quite sparse, whereas the dashboard is quite busy. The SpiderOak client has plenty of features, but it can be a little tricky to learn. You can even pair Backblaze with a smaller plan from a cloud storage service like (read our review) and save money without losing the sharing features. It wins this category and evens the score at 1-1. Overall, unless you want to protect smaller amounts of data spread across many computers, Backblaze is the cheaper option. This is better, but we would still recommend a provider like Acronis if you need to back up three or five devices, as it’s cheaper for backing up multiple devices (read our Acronis Cyber Protect review). If you have multiple computers and need less than 5TB of online storage space, it might end up cheaper than five individual Backblaze plans. At just $29 per month, it’s surprisingly competitive. Even the 150GB plan costs $6 per month, and 2TB costs $14 per month, which is far more than Backblaze, especially if you get a two-year plan. There’s even a file syncing option if you want to avoid doing a manual file transfer every time you move between two devices.Īlthough SpiderOak comes with a 21-day free trial - six more days than Backblaze offers - the good news runs out there. This is a great way to get around file size limits on emails without paying for a second service. You can choose any folder within your backup to add to a “share room.” Then, by connecting to this “share room” with its ID and password, anyone can look at and download the files that are inside. Perhaps the biggest difference in terms of features is that SpiderOak has some basic file sharing features that we would normally expect to see from cloud storage services such as pCloud (read our full pCloud review). You’ll get things such as an unlimited file versioning feature, some sharing and syncing options and the ability to back up individual files - including operating system files. On the other hand, SpiderOak One comes with a far fuller feature set. This costs $99 for a flash drive of up to 256GB or $189 for an external drive of up to 8TB, and the cost is fully refunded when you return the device. You can use continuous, daily or manual backups with Backblaze.īackblaze also has a courier recovery service. You can also check out our SpiderOak One review and our Backblaze review for more information on the individual services. However, SpiderOak wins in both the privacy and security rounds. If you’re looking for a quick answer, Backblaze snags a close win by beating out SpiderOak in pricing, ease of use, speed and customer support. Even if they’re not our top favorites, both of these providers are still really good. SpiderOak has superior features and stronger security.Īlthough neither is the best service out there - Backblaze lost in our IDrive vs Backblaze comparison and SpiderOak fell short in our Dropbox vs SpiderOak comparison - both fought hard and picked up points in some key categories.Backblaze is fast, easy to use and a great value for the money.SpiderOak and Backblaze are both top backup services with a few weaknesses.In this SpiderOak vs Backblaze comparison, we’ll look at where these two top services shine and the downsides you should consider when deciding between them. With so many good backup services out there, it can be hard to work out which one you should pick. Last Updated: 21 Apr'23 T09:19:16+00:00 Facts checked by Eugenie Tiu MP4 Repair: How to Fix Corrupted Video Files in 2019. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |